Policy 1 of 6
Why I Back a Land Value Tax
I'm backing a Land Value Tax because working-class communities like mine have been taxed unfairly for decades, while wealth sitting quietly in land goes largely untouched. Council tax is stuck on 1991 values, a system so outdated that a mansion in Westminster can pay less than a modest terrace up north. That's not an accident. It's a design that protects the already-wealthy while squeezing families who can least afford it.
The evidence backs this up. Independent modelling shows the biggest winners from a land value tax would be places like Hartlepool, Blackpool and Middlesbrough: deprived, post-industrial towns where households could pay around £1,600 a year less. Meanwhile, the biggest bills would land on prime London property, where land values have been allowed to balloon untaxed for a generation. That's not punishing success, it's finally asking land wealth to pay its share.
I also believe in scrapping stamp duty, a tax that punishes ordinary people simply for moving house, whether that's chasing a job, downsizing, or finding a home near family. No other tax works quite so hard to trap people in place.
I'm not naive about the transition. It has to be done carefully, phased in gradually, with protection for people who've just bought their home, and support for those who are asset-rich but cash-poor. But the destination is worth it: a fairer system where wealth locked up in land, not workers' wages, carries the weight, and where a family home in Blackpool never again pays more tax than a mansion in Kensington.
Back to top ↑